| 微信 : Adelaidehelp 联系邮箱 : [email protected] 开启辅助访问
  • 区域置顶

      打印 上一主题 下一主题

      [吐槽爆料] We Are Very "Shy"

      [复制链接]
      跳转到指定楼层
      楼主
      jian11 发表于 12-6-2017 17:11:48
      1464 2

      本内容为网友发布信息,仅代表原作者观点,不代表本平台立场。

      According to the suggestions of  some netizens who would like to  be my language coach, I just make a correction here:

      We are very "Shy" in talking about "64".  The original post is still on this front page.

      Thank you.



      BBS提醒: 请避免提前支付订金、押金等任何费用,请与对方当面沟通,确认资质并看清条款。谨防上当受骗。

      免责声明: 本网站所提供的信息,只供参考之用。本网站不保证信息的准确性、有效性、及时性和完整性。本网站及其雇员一概毋须以任何方式就任何信息传递或传送的失误、不准确或错误,对用户或任何其他人士负任何直接或间接责任。在法律允许的范围内,本网站在此声明,不承担用户或任何人士就使用或未能使用本网站所提供的信息或任何链接所引致的任何直接、间接、附带、从属、特殊、惩罚性或惩戒性的损害赔偿。

      收藏收藏 顶 踩
      回复

      使用道具 举报

      沙发
       楼主| jian11 发表于 12-6-2017 17:25:16
      To be frank, De-politicisation has been a key feature of the chinese press post-1989.  And although some content is still handled according to political diktat, the daily news flow is largely free from political oversight and is designed to appeal to readers and advertisers.

      Marketization has transformed the chinese press since "64".

      This BBS, as a news media, apparently knows the rope in the industry and I just "co-operate" with the trendings by not passing the "red line".

      Hope you can understand it.

      Do you agree?
      What do you think?
      回复 支持 反对

      使用道具 举报

      板凳
       楼主| jian11 发表于 12-6-2017 20:17:26
      Playing  the game of semantics (manipulation of words) is not my job.
      回复 支持 反对

      使用道具 举报

      您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

      本版积分规则

      其他网友还看了 ...

      Copyright @ 2022 AdelaideBBS.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement

      客服号

      公众号